Thursday, May 14, 2015

Life Cycle Analysis of a Toothpaste Tube

It is incredible to think about the significance of a tube of toothpaste and its impact on the environment. For a product so simple, completing a life cycle impact analysis (LCA) is quite complex. The act of brushing your teeth is something that nearly everyone does: it is both socially and hygienically expected of you to do. It also requires you to use a certain amount of water. Most accessible toothpaste varieties include many chemicals, and some even contain micro-beads, which can’t always be filtered out of the water supply.  Producing and transporting this toothpaste also uses significant amounts of resources and releases pollutants. To effectively create a LCA for Aquafresh fluoride toothpaste, we would need to evaluate the life cycle from extraction, production, transportation, use and last disposal of a single tube of toothpaste. 

The ingredients used in toothpaste are mostly chemicals, and although I’m sure their life cycle is harmful, these materials were not listed in Okala’s LCA bill of materials chart. So for this product analysis, I will focus on the packaging tube itself, which also contains many chemicals. There are multiple layers of polyethylene used for its sealing properties, and opalescent polyethylene is used for a flexible base material and white color. Vapor deposited PET is included for rigidity, ability to maintain shape and moisture barrier properties (AICELLO, pg.1). Polyethylene itself is created by modifying natural gas or the catalytic cracking of crude oil into gasoline (LePoutre, pg.1). This is not a good beginning to this tube’s lifecycle. Suppliers for Aquafresh are located all throughout Europe (and I'm sure other continents as well), and the toothpaste is sold all over the world, leaving an immense transportation impact. On top of all that, it is not recyclable.


Product: A Toothpaste Tube
System boundary: Analysis of the tube alone, not the toothpaste inside of it or use of the toothpaste.
Functional unit: One tube, approximately 2 ounces in weight.
Lifespan: Approximately four months

SBOM:
Total tube weight = 2 oz. = 0.125 lbs
Composition:
PET, amorphous, primary = 1.8/lb * 0.06 = .108
Aluminum, primary = 13/lb * 0.05= .65
EVA, primary= 1.3/lb * 0.01= .013
Sealing tape= 0.18/lb *0.005= .0009
White pigment=2.8/lb*0.06=.168
Processing:
Injection molding= 0.72/lb*.725=.522
Aluminum milling= 9.9/lb*0.05=.495
Transportation:
Intercontinental air freight= 1.6/ton-mi*.125= 0.2
Disposal:
Polyethylenes in controlled landfill 0.3/lb*(.06+.01) =0.021

Total: 2.1779 LCA impact factor points

This may not seem like a large impact number, but remember this is only a 2 oz. piece of packaging. There is room for improvement in the use of recycled products, mode of transport, and extension of product life through design for disassembly and recyclability.


New design with reduced impact:
Using recycled polyethylene products would make improvements in the life cycle analysis of a tube of toothpaste. However, I’m not sure that this would make the product actually recyclable. I think that the “tube” design of toothpaste may need to be eliminated altogether. If a glass container with a recyclable or reusable dispenser, designed in a shape where the toothpaste would be funneled to the dispenser so not to be wasted, the product could be recyclable and eliminate the many plastics and processes included in the toothpaste tube. If possible, it could even be sold in a box with a free shipping label so that it could be returned for free and reused by the manufacturer. A glass jar keeps the toothpaste preserved and contained naturally, and does not need the plastics and chemicals included traditionally. 

Product: Glass toothpaste container with recyclable dispenser
Functional unit: One container, about one pound in weight.
Lifespan: About 4 months, but recyclable or reusable at end of its life.

SBOM:
Composition:
Bottled Glass, sec (clear recycled glass) =.38/lb*0.95 =0.361
HDPE, secondary (recycled hard plastic that is recyclable by some) = 1.2/lb*0.05= 0.06
Aluminum, secondary (metal spring in dispenser)= 0.55*0.0001=0.00055
Processing:
Injection molding = 0.72/lb*0.05 = 0.036
Transportation:
Ocean freighter= 0.053/ton-mi *1 = 0.053
Disposal:
Glass = recyclable
Polyethylene (HDPE) 0.3/lb*0.05= 0.015

New Total: 0.525055 =~0.525 LCA impact factor points




Works Cited:

AICELLO. "What is polyethylene laminating film (sealant laminating film)?." Suzulon L: Sealant Laminating Film. AICELLO, n.d. Web. 14 May 2015. <http://www.suzulon-l.com/PE_laminating_film.html>.

LePoutre, Priscilla. "The Manufacture of Polyethylene." Transpak Industries Ltd., n.d. Web. 14 May 2015. <http://nzic.org.nz/ChemProcesses/polymers/10J.pdf>.



Saturday, May 9, 2015

Putting a Value on Energy Efficiency

The Bullitt Center is said to be the most energy efficient commercial office building in the world. This article talks about how they are taking an interesting, first-of-it's kind approach to putting a value on their savings from energy efficiency.

Using a finance structure similar to that of a power purchase agreement for solar or othr forms of electricity, their plan is to meter the amount of energy use the building would have used as a traditional building, and then the Bullitt Center will sell back it's unused energy to Seattle's electricity company. Putting a monetary value on their energy savings could be a great incentive for other buildings and companies to improve their energy efficiency. 

Net Impact is visiting the Bullitt Center today, and I'm excited to learn more about this building!

Wednesday, April 29, 2015

NYC's Social and Environmental Sustainability Goals

This article immediately made me think of the Michael Green's ted talk on the Social Progress Index. The mayor of New York City makes the city's plan more comprehensive by putting an equal emphasis on the environment and income inequality within the sustainable development plan. 45% of NYC's population is at or under the poverty level, and as stated in the article we cannot address physical vulnerability to climate change without addressing the local economy and inequality. Read more to see both their main social and environmental goals and their plans for change! 

http://www.greenbiz.com/article/new-york-citys-plan-fuse-sustainability-social-equity-and-resilience

Friday, April 24, 2015

Footprint Update!

Update on my goals to reduce my Ecological Footprint: 

1) Water and Energy Usage: So far, this area is going great. I'm achieving my water goals and have managed to fit unplugging appliances into my schedule at night and most mornings. However, I realized that there is really not that much to unplug in my apartment, so I'm doubtful that it will make a measurable difference. I want to make sure my footprint actually IS reduced after this project, so I signed up for PSE's Green Power Program and chose to switch 100% of our energy to renewables. My friend signed me up for the program and I was pleased to learn that only low-impact hydro power is included in the renewable energy mix.

2) Food Consumption: It has been hard for me to stick to local options for my fruits and veggies, mainly because the last two weekends I have been unable to make it to the Downtown Farmer's Market. However, I will definitely be purchasing my start-up plants for my garden from the farmer's market once I get a lifted garden set up in my yard. I have been sticking to organic options in the store.

3) Waste: So far, I have been composting, but doing so by bumming off other people with FoodPlus bins or bringing my compost to school...
I contacted SCC and it would only cost our property $8/month for composting service, so I've informed my property manager to see if she would be interested in doing this. My house has 4 units in it, and our unit alone would never fill up a whole 60-gallon bin by ourselves, so I am hoping it can be done collectively. 
As for packaging, I have not been obtaining any new plastic bags, and I have been buying food with only recyclable packaging. However, my house needs to move away from our obsession with paper towels. 

Overall it's been going well, but there is still room for improvement.

Thursday, April 23, 2015

Hope for Sustainability in LA

Everyone's been talking about California's water shortage, and I came across a great story about an entreprenuer who has been working to heal the environment and help the people of LA since 1973. Andy Lipkis is the founder of TreePeople, which he created at age 18. He has been very successful at implementing forest-inspired technologies to make cities more sustainable while also mitigating floods and pollution. Most recently, Los Angeles's Mayor Garcetti proposed a sustainability plan (pLAn) on April 8th, which TreePeople proudly supports and has offered to work with city agencies, local businesses and community organization to help achieve this plan.

Find the full sustainability pLAn here


Wednesday, April 15, 2015

The Divestment Campaign

Here at Western Washington University and at many other universities around the country there has been a campaign to divest in fossil fuels. WWU's website states that "Western is a university of the environment, and sustainability is at the heart of what we do here." However, even with an active, on-going campaign on campus for divestment we have yet to join the movement. This article provides excellent reasons on why divesting from fossil fuels is the financially optimal and socially responsible choice. Investing in renewable energy lowers risk, increases returns and provides more jobs than the fossil fuel industry. Marketing-wise, I think this movement is doing great for targeting academic institutions like WWU. Divesting in fossil fuels is an innovative, foward-thinking decision that corresponds with our universities missions, leads other institutions and organizations to do the same, and drives the renewable energy market!

http://www.greenbiz.com/article/responsible-fossil-fuel-divestment

Monday, April 13, 2015

Toxic Cosmetics

This is not my first time using EWG's SkinDeep Database. For another class I have had to evaluate my cosmetics and I was quite shocked with the results. Since then, I have been using coconut oil instead of body lotion, switched to using a men’s deodorant that is not an antiperspirant in order to avoid aluminum, and use olive oil as a make-up remover which works great. This time I decided to evaluate my Tone Moisturizing Body Wash with Cocoa Butter and Mango Splash. 

The ingredients include:

  • Fragrance
  • DMDM Hydantoin (Formaldehyde releaser)
  • PEG-7 Glyceryl Cocoate
  • Cocomidopropyl Betaine
  • Laureth-4
  • Tocopheryl Acetate
  • PEG-8
  • Sodium Laureth Sulfate
  • FD&C Red 4
  • Propylene Glycol
  • Tetrasodium EDTA
  • Glycerin
  • Citric Acid
  • D& C Yellow 5 Aluminum LAke
  • Gylcol Distearate
  • Aloe Barbadensis (Aloe Vera) Flower Extract
  • PPG-2 Hydroxyethl Coco/Isostearamide
  • Carica Papaya Fruit Extract
  • Theobroma Cacao Extract
  • Mangifera Indica (Mango) Fruit Extract
  • Macrocystic Pyrifera (Kelp) Extract
  • Cocamidopropyl PG-Dimonium Chloride Phosphate
  • Cocamidopropyl Hydroxysultaine
  • Theobroma cacao seed butter
  • Polyquaternium-10
  • Water
  • Sodium Chloride

First thought: Wow that's a lot of an ingredients, and many of them I have no idea what they are...

The data level was limited meaning there wasn't many scientific studies available on its ingredients, but even with the data available this body wash was scored 6/10 - a moderate hazard. The second ingredient listed was DMDM Hydantoin (formaldehyde releaser). This was scored as a high hazard and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) states that formaldehyde is a known carcinogen.Why is there a known cancer causing agent in a body wash that I use daily?? No matter how small the amount that can't be healthy. 

After doing some more research I found that formaldehyde releasers are found in about 1 in 5 cosmetic products, and its use is not regulated by the FDA (Congleton, 2015).These are chemicals that will decompose over time to form molecules of formaldehyde when added to water (Congleton, 2015). Formaldehyde acts as a preservative and is much more toxic when inhaled. Sodium benzoate is a safer alternative preservative so this is one thing I will pay attention to next time I am purchasing new products.

To avoid formaldehyde in cosmetics, you have to avoid these 7 main formaldehyde releasing ingredients:
-DMDM hydantoin
-Imidazolidinyl urea
-Diazolidinyl urea
-Quaternium-15
-Bronopol (2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol )
-5-Bromo-5-nitro-1,3-dioxane
-Hydroxymethylglycinate

Looks like I'm going to have to find another yet another substitute.

Congleton, Johanna (2015). "Is cancer-causing formaldehyde in your cosmetics?" Environmental Working Group. Online. http://www.ewg.org/research/exposing-cosmetics-cover/formaldehyde-releasers


EWG's SkinDeep Cosmetics Database (2015). "Tone Moisturizing Body Wash with Cocoa Butter, Mango Splash." Environmental Working Group. Online. http://www.ewg.org/skindeep/product/468061/Tone_Moisturizing_Body_Wash_with_Cocoa_Butter%2C_Mango_Splash/

National Cancer Institute (2015). "Formaldehyde and Cancer Risk." National Institute of Health. Online. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/causes-prevention/risk/substances/formaldehyde/formaldehyde-fact-sheet